Vienna Schience and Technology Fund (WWTF)
Under Digital Humanism Call 2020
In ShapeTech we research the ambivalence between self-optimization and
health promotion by
exploring the design options and usage contexts of self-monitoring tools with the goal of
humanizing highly digitized work. The ShapeTech project will focus on ‘brainwork’, which
include, administrative work, the technical organization, monitoring
and planning of production, research and development, and non-material production (such as
IT services and software development), but also leadership and management activities. In
doing so, the project will analyze how employees in such work environments use a self-monitoring
tool based on biometric data to become aware of stressful situations at work, how
they may share their experiences in occupational health circles and how joint suggestions for
improvements of work situations may be developed. The project will thus promote humanized,
balance-oriented design and usage of self-monitoring tools currently gaining currency and, at
the same time, use these tools to support the humanization of highly digitized work.
Self-monitoring tools may be beneficial for employees at first sight but they pose risks and may
have a negative impact on health and in the long run also on companies and society at large.
The key differentiating factor – if such tools lead to health promotion or health deterioration
is how these tools are used, which is heavily influenced by their design. Therefore, our overall
research question is:
How can self-monitoring tools – using biometric data – be designed, implemented and
used so that they contribute to empowering employees to improve their work situation
and health?
The following sub-questions will be answered in the course of the project:
Screening & analysis of technologies and tool development & adaptation
● Which self-monitoring tools, using biometric data, exist on the market?
● How reliable is the provided feedback of these tools and how can their reliability and
suitability be improved?
Testing the monitoring tool in the working context
● How do people interact with a selected tool and how do they experience this interaction, the
feedback from the tool, and the user interface (UI) (e.g. adaption of behaviour based on the
feedback)?
● What functionalities and aspects of the user interface do employees in highly digitized
‘brainwork’ refer to in their discussions on working conditions and what adaptations of the
technology seem feasible?
● How may self-monitoring tools be used to detect causes of stress in highly digitized work
environments?
● How to personalize stress/concentration-level extraction algorithms and improve their
performance?
● How to run algorithms on resource constrained devices to reduce/avoid data transmission
and thus decrease privacy and security obstacles?
Potentials for empowerment and co-determination
● How do self-monitoring tools change the perception of one's work?
● How do workers reflect on work situations on the basis of the feedback they get from the
tool?
●To what extent can collective reflection on working conditions, e.g. within occupational
health circles, empower workers to improve working conditions?
● What are individual, collective, work-related and organizational antecedents that determine
(non)adaptation of work organization and technology?
● What organizational measures are needed to overcome individualization and self-optimization
and to support joint influence of workers on highly digitized working conditions?